I read this book when was first published, and am happy to
see it reissued in both paper and electronic format. Upon re-reading it from
the perspective of an older person I better appreciate its considerable depth
and scope. I was a student of the author around the time the book was first
published and nominated for the National Book Award, a fact I should mention
though I don’t think it prejudices my review of the book.
The story and subplots all succeed individually and as
they’re interwoven. The reader gets a vivid vision of the city of Chicago in the late 1950’s,
a city I’ve never visited or seen except from the window of a plane. It is partly this vision that weaves or binds
the many elements into a rich tapestry. Imagine an intricate and detailed pen
and ink drawing of an apartment building with the wall cut away, hundreds of
people going about their daily lives in their homes, a spaghetti-like complex
of highways jammed with vehicles, planes in the sky, people on the streets, the
details of which can only be seen with a magnifying glass, and also seeing the
entire picture, sort of like some of the drawings of Peter Aschwanden. The
picture is both microcosmic and macrocosmic.
A particular scene of many that might come to mind describes
the detective Magnuson walking through alleys that many years earlier he had
used to walk to and from work. There apparently are or were all these wide
alleys in Chicago
which serve as unofficial pedestrian arteries. On either side are the backyards
of homes, so there’s this whole insular world of families and neighbors and
passers-by that is unseen by visitors, known only to Chicagoans. The
descriptions of scenes and characters in this book are extraordinary, Dickensian
as other reviewers have said.
This is a book to be read again and again. When I read it as
a young man, I couldn’t grasp it in its totality, but particular chapters I
would read numerous times, enthralled with the large cast of secondary
characters, including gangsters, small time punks, a young man in search of his
roots, working class people enjoying themselves at a Polish American picnic,
and more, too much to tell about here, all the good and the bad in human nature
personified. The chapters concerning the main character Magnuson did not so
much interest me then as they do now, and his evolution—or his disintegration,
depending on how you look at it—stands out for me upon reading the book now.
Some reviewers have thought the prose to be overwrought or
florid in places, and there might be something in that. It did seem to me that
in some spots the author might have been reaching some in trying to define and
convey the thoughts and feelings and memories of Magnuson. He is a somewhat uncommunicative
character who keeps much to himself, who is both famous and unknown, a pillar
of the city and yet alien to it, whose mystery I can only partly solve.
There’s so much I want to say about this book, but every word I don’t write puts you the
reader of this review one word closer to reading the book instead of reading
this. The Death of the Detective is enthralling from cover to cover any which
way you read it. It’s probably more in the literary than detective genres, but
it’s both. Download a free sample from an online retailer and see if it doesn’t
pull you in and leave you wanting to read more.
No comments:
Post a Comment